A country in a hurry to hang people


What says the law? You will not kill. How does it say it? By killing! (Victor Hugo)

A murderous rage swept through Delhi December 2013 as young men and women braved batons and water cannons with a chant “kill them” right at the footsteps of Raisina Hills, the seat of Indian power. Every lips read, “death, death, death to rapists”.

Nine months down the line when a judge thundered “hang them till death”, young women in a Delhi newsroom erupted into a thunderous applause. ‘Eye for an eye’ has settled their quest for revenge against four of the six men who brutally raped and murdered a young girl on a moving bus.

The court complex in south Delhi’s Saket where the sentence was pronounced was no different. Youths chased defence lawyers while another group with hooded heads and noose around neck demanding death for the rapists happily posed for photographs.

A fortnight before the sentencing of the four youth – a fifth one committed suicide in jail during trial – the countrymen had exhausted themselves arguing against a three-year sentence to a teenager under Juveniles Justice Act as he was a minor at the time of committing crime. People wanted to see him hung.

The ghastly crime made people come out from the cosiness of their homes to the December chill never before. There were demands for public hanging, shooting them dead in public, castration and you name it, any inhuman punishment. Media too fuelled it by thrusting a microphone to anyone who came their way.

Everyone played to the gallery – from politicians to activists to experts. National-level leaders like Sushma Swaraj were shouting for executing the rapists. In one of her outbursts in Parliament, she even said she would move a private members bill demanding death for the rapist minor, who turned an adult during trial.

Be it in TV studios or streets or colleges or offices, December chatter was all about death to rapists. As it marched towards a new year and new hope, India became a country in a hurry to hang people.


To take a life when a life has been lost is revenge, not justice (Desmond Tutu)

But then hysteria and mobocracy overtook reasoning and everybody out on the street — be it a rickshaw puller, student, or professional — wanted instant death for rapists.

During the protests, revenge and not punishment was the underlying current. Public was in no mood to discuss the role of socio-economic situation that leads to crimes. Crowds thronged the streets and no amount of teargas shells, water cannons or baton charges could deter them. Not to speak of the day, they occupied the streets even in dark hours and the government was on its knees.

Public pressure set the ball rolling for changes in the system. A fast track court was set up. A Commission was formed under former Chief Justice J S Verma to recommend far-reaching measures to fight violence against women. Many came up with numerous suggestions and in sync with the public mood, most of them favoured measures ranging from death penalty to castration

Everybody was revolted by the brutality of the crime against the girl, who dreamt of making it big one day, and no doubt, wanted stringent punishment. But is death penalty the solution?

One of the prominent organisers of the Delhi protests was Kavita Krishnan of CPI(ML), who has taken a position against death penalty. After the verdict too, she says death penalty is not the panacea for tackling rapists or crime against women.

Nevertheless, the protesters from various backgrounds did not have any qualms in propagating the ‘tit-for-tat’ theory. Arguments against death penalty were met with a heavy dose of emotional outburst like what if it happens to one in your family and like that. Those who opposed death penalty were verbally butchered and asked to shun their “Leftism” at least in this case.

The panel headed by Justice Verma, a conscientious jurist but never part of the candlelight vigil crowd, refused to go with the popular narrative and said there is “considerable” evidence that the deterrent effect of death penalty on serious crimes is “actually a myth”. The panel recommended enhancement of punishment to put the rapist behind the bars for his entire life.

One of the defence lawyers was of the view that he was fine with death for his clients if there is no rape in the city in the next few months. This may be pushing the argument a bit far. One should not forget that Delhi recorded around 800 rape cases since the December 16 incident despite the unprecedented outcry. Death penalty has not instilled the fear in people and worldwide experience shows that. Why not India think about a stronger deterrent like imprisoning one for his entire life to tackle grievous crimes?


POSTSCRIPT: India houses 414 death row convicts in its jails across, which includes 97 who were sentenced to the gallows last year alone and most of them from the poor strata of the society. Mumbai attacker Ajmal Kasab was the lone person who was executed last year. French philosopher Albert Camus has once said, capital punishment is the most premeditated of murders.

(This article appeared in Deccan Herald’s Spotlight section on September 22, 2013)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: